French courts allow injunction to restrain unfair competition via the publication of misleading scientific study
On October 26, 2020 By Johanna SCHWARTZ MIRALLES
In a decision that has regrettably gotten buried in the flurry of recent public health news, on 4 March 2020, France’s High Court (Cour de cassation) issued an opinion restricting the right of companies to publish and share scientific studies that cast doubt on the safety of competitors’ products where those studies do not have a sufficient scientific basis.
In the case, a manufacturer of stone countertops shared via its website and on various social media platforms a study, carried out on the manufacturer’s behalf by a private laboratory, suggesting that countertops made of quartz agglomerate can be dangerous to consumers’ health. The manufacturer also contacted a consumer magazine making similar claims.
In response, an industry group representing producers of quartz agglomerate sought a preliminary injunction against the manufacturer, claiming that the manufacturer’s public statements constituted unfair competition (dénigrement commercial).
The industry group’s argument, which ultimately persuaded France’s High Court, was that the study cited by the manufacturer established, at most, that airborne particles from quartz agglomerate could be harmful to the health of people who inhale or ingest them. The study did not address whether, in the absence of particulate matter, merely placing food products on a countertop made of quartz agglomerate could cause adverse health effects. Given the lack of reliable evidence for the defendant’s claim, it constituted a form of unfair competition for the defendant to cite the study as evidence that consumers’ health could be placed at risk by using quartz agglomerate countertops.
This decision should remind companies to be careful before sharing information via social media if the information could be potentially adverse to competitors. Doing so can give rise to lawsuits seeking damages or an injunction, even if the information shared is true. To the extent that a company anticipates sharing or publishing information adverse to a competitor, careful attention should be paid to the factors French courts consider when determining whether an unfair competition claim can lie: first, whether the public has an interest in the information; second, whether there is a sufficient factual basis for the assertion; and third, whether the means by which the information is shared is measured and appropriate (in the High Court’s words, the message must be expressed “avec une certaine mesure”).
Our latest news
DELCADE ranked in the 2024 edition of the Chambers & Partners Europe guide
The entire DELCADE team is proud to be ranked in the prestigious international legal guide Chambers & Partners 2023 in the category France – The Regions as one of France’s leading law firms. This distinction confirms the excellence of our lawyers’ know-how in all areas of business law and their ongoing commitment to their clients. […]
ReadWebinar | EU AI Act Impact: Your Business Game Plan now – Isabelle Gavanon speaker on April 10th
On April 10, 2024, at 6:00 PM Paris time, Isabelle Gavanon, partner at DELCADE, will participate as a speaker to the webinar organized by Consulegis, an international network of independent law firms and accountants of which DELCADE is a member. This webinar will address the real impact of the European Union’s AI Act on businesses […]
ReadDELCADE announces the appointment of Julie Piquet and Guilhem Argueyrolles as partners
DELCADE is delighted to welcome Julie Piquet and Guilhem Argueyrolles as partners. The arrival of these two lawyers, each with their complementary skills, allows for the creation of a new department specialized in the field of insurance law.
Read